Retrieves before it answers
Each question starts with a search of a curated legal corpus. The answer is built from what was found, not from memory.
JurisGPT for the UAE · Early access
Your UAE matters.The right context, together.
Keep each agreement, its evidence, your review decisions and the working draft in one matter, with the applicable legal regime in view from the first document to the approved export.
Early access · India and UAE · Every answer traced to its source
Northstar Industries · Services agreementFictional example
Termination and payment review
In reviewTopicFindingSource
Termination notice30 daysCl. 8
Invoice payment15 daysCl. 5
Confidentiality term3 yearsCl. 11
Governing lawTo confirmCl. 14
Clause 8 · Version 2
“Either party may terminate this agreement by giving thirty days’ written notice to the other party.”
Reviewer noteConfirm how notice must be delivered and whether the period matches the client’s instructions.
A source passage supports review. It is not a legal conclusion or sign-off.
- Matters
- Research
- Citations
- Review
- Drafts
- Approvals
- Exports
What is JurisGPT
A legal workspace that shows its sources.
JurisGPT is a citation-grounded legal research assistant and matter workspace for law firms and in-house teams in India and the UAE. It finds the relevant law, answers with citations, and keeps your documents, findings and drafts together.
Cites the section
Statutes, sections and judgments are cited so you can open the passage and check it yourself.
States its confidence
Every answer says how much evidence supports it, and where the limits are.
Says so when it doesn't know
If the corpus doesn't contain the answer, JurisGPT tells you instead of guessing.
Built-in separation
A UAE question is never answered from Indian law.
Jurisdiction is a hard retrieval filter, not a hint in a prompt. Indian and UAE sources live in separate corpora, so a search in one country can never return the other’s law.
- Indian legal documents
- 47,000+Indian legal documentsStatutes, judgments, clauses and FAQs
- UAE records
- 690+UAE recordsFederal, DIFC and ADGM statute articles, FAQs and deadlines
- Jurisdictions, kept apart
- 2Jurisdictions, kept apartA hard filter on every search
Current corpus snapshot, selected sources only. See the coverage notes below.
Why it matters
Every answer, traced to its source.
Lawyers can only rely on what they can verify. JurisGPT shows the passage, the version and the limits behind every result.
The JurisGPT Assistant
Ask a legal question. See exactly where the answer comes from.
The assistant retrieves the relevant law first, answers with citations, states how confident it is, and tells you when it does not know.
- Retrieves before it answers
- Cites the section
- States confidence and limits
- Says so when it doesn't know
India and UAE are searched separately: a UAE question is never answered from Indian law.
JurisGPT AssistantIndia
Choose a question to see how the assistant answers.
Illustrative example. Check the original source before relying on any result.
The platform
One workspace from first file to final draft.
Research is only the start. Documents, evidence, drafts and people work together here, so the record is always complete.
Bring the client's agreements, amendments and instructions into one place, with every saved version and the colleagues working on them.
- Exact document versions kept with the matter
- Colleagues invited per workspace or matter, with roles
- Every finding tied to the version it came from
Northstar Industries · DocumentsFictional examplePrivate matter- Services agreement.docxVersion 2Ready
- Supplier terms.pdfVersion 1Ready
- Client instructions.txtVersion 3Ready
Who can see this matter
- ARA. RaoMatter lead
- MKM. KhanReviewer
- SPS. PatelViewer
Ask a legal question and get an answer built from the relevant statutes and judgments, with the passage behind each citation.
- Answers cite the statute, section or judgment
- Confidence and limits stated with every answer
- India and the UAE searched separately
Research · Public previewIndiaWhat makes a contract valid under the Indian Contract Act?Source excerptCentral ActSection 10
“All agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent of parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object…”
The Indian Contract Act, 1872 · Check the original and any amendments before relying on it.
Public law and your client files are kept apart. Use public or hypothetical facts here.
Record your analysis in an evidence table, turn an approved review into a working memorandum and compare saved versions side by side.
- An evidence table holding your own findings
- Drafts you can edit, save and compare
- Separate approval of the exact version, then export DOCX or TXT
Working memorandum · Version 3Fictional example- Evidence table Approved
- 2Draft memorandum v3 Awaiting approval
Compare version 2 and version 3
Either party may terminate on thirty (30) days’ written notice.
Either party may terminate on sixty (60) days’ written notice.
Approval applies to this exact saved version.Export DOCX
How it works
One matter. From first file to final version.
Six steps, one thread. Documents, passages and decisions stay attached to the matter, so nobody has to reconstruct what happened.
Review and draft approvals are separate. Your team approves an exact saved version; workflow approval does not certify legal accuracy or current law.
Add documents
Open a matter and upload the agreements, amendments and client instructions.
Inspect evidence
Search the files and read each passage in its original context.
Record findings
Log what you found in a review table, tied to the exact version.
Prepare a draft
Turn an approved review into a working memorandum.
Review & approve
Edit, save a version and get the draft approved separately.
Export the version
Download the exact saved DOCX or TXT your team approved.
Why JurisGPT
Built for matters, not just conversations.
General-purpose AI chat is a good start for a single question. A legal matter needs more.
| Capability | General-purpose AI chat | JurisGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Client files kept in a private, role-based matter | Varies by product | Matter-based access |
| Cites the statute or section behind an answer | Varies by product | Citations to source passages |
| States confidence and says when it doesn't know | Not designed for this | Confidence and limits shown |
| Tracks every version of a document | Not designed for this | Exact saved versions |
| Human approval on an exact version | Not designed for this | Separate approvals |
| Keeps Indian and UAE law apart | Not designed for this | Hard jurisdiction filter |
Capabilities of general-purpose tools vary by product and plan. JurisGPT is in early access; AI-assisted review and drafting are in development.
Solutions
Made for the way your team works.
Law firms and in-house teams share a need for clear evidence, dependable records and a considered final document.
Private matter · Exact versions
Keep the client's context with the work.
Bring an agreement, its amendments and the client's instructions into one matter. Inspect the wording, record findings and prepare a reviewed working draft.
- Client files and document versions
- Evidence, review and decision history
- Colleague access and approval
India and the UAE
Start with the right legal context.
One workspace, distinct legal contexts. Choose the country and check the law, source dates and applicability for the matter.
IN · India-first research
India
Keep Indian research and commercial document work together, with selected central-law source passages to inspect.
Current-law and amendment verification remain incomplete. Case-law and state-specific coverage are limited.
Explore JurisGPT India →
AE · Coverage in development
United Arab Emirates
Keep the applicable federal, emirate, DIFC or ADGM context visible while your team works on its documents.
Coverage is in development: selected federal law plus selected DIFC and ADGM instruments. It is not complete, emirate-specific coverage is limited, and bilingual legal support is still in development.
Explore JurisGPT UAE →Coverage is selective. Always check the original source, its dates and any amendments before relying on a result.
Our research
Built on open, reproducible research.
JurisGPT's retrieval is grounded in our own peer-reviewable benchmark work, and the code, benchmark and results are open for anyone to check.
Research paper
When Generic Cross-Encoders Hurt: A Five-Configuration Study of Citation-Grounded Legal Retrieval for Indian Startup Law
Kandimalla Bruhadev, Mohammad Shaheem Abdul Salam, Jonna Uday Keerthan
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
92.5%
Precision@5 for dense retrieval, vs 86.7% for the lexical baseline
0.938
MRR for the hybrid BM25 path, the best of five configurations
−13.7 pts
nDCG@5 when a generic cross-encoder reranker was added: a sharp negative result
120-query benchmark · six legal categories · 47,606-document corpus · five retrieval configurations
Results are for Indian startup and corporate law retrieval. The UAE corpus has not been benchmarked yet, and paper results do not establish the accuracy of the current product.
Security and trust
Security you can inspect, and honesty about what's not done yet.
Law firms hold confidential material. Here is exactly what exists today, and what we have not yet independently verified.
Not yet done
- No independent audit, penetration test or certification yet.
- Encryption specifics, key management and backups are not yet documented.
- Before any confidential pilot we review deployment, storage, retention and any external model processing with your firm.
Revocable sessions
Password sign-in with server-tracked sessions that can be revoked, with credentials held in host-only HttpOnly cookies.
Private API checks
Private API requests are checked against the signed-in account before they are forwarded.
Role-based matter access
Workspace and matter roles control who can view, edit and manage work.
Origin-checked requests
State-changing browser requests are checked for origin, Fetch Metadata and a required application header.
Rate limiting
Rate limits apply across the API, plus a per-IP limit on the public demo.
Strict security headers
Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options DENY and other hardening headers on every frontend response.
Plans
Plans that fit your firm.
We are onboarding firms in early access, and pricing is tailored to your team. Tell us about your practice and we will put together the right plan.
Boutique & solo
Small practices getting organized.
- Private matters and document versions
- Citation-grounded research
- Drafts with saved versions
- Guided onboarding
Mid-size firms
Teams that review and draft together.
- Shared workspaces with roles
- Review tables, drafts and approvals
- Matter-level colleague access
- Onboarding for your whole team
Large firms & in-house
Multiple teams and stricter requirements.
- Multiple teams and matters
- Deployment and security review
- Tailored rollout plan
- A named point of contact
During early access, evaluate with fictional or non-confidential material. We review deployment, storage and access with you before any confidential pilot.
Questions, answered
Before you begin.
The practical details behind the workspace.
Still have a question? Book a demo →
No. JurisGPT is a matter workspace. Private documents and versions, citation-grounded research, review tables, working drafts and approvals all live together. Research answers cite the source passages behind them, and AI-assisted review and drafting are in development.
Book a demo
See JurisGPT on your own matters.
Tell us about your practice and we’ll walk through the workflow, deployment, security and pricing.